On my latest trip to the mall I couldn't believe my eyes. There it was in the middle of a busy mall, a lady performing teeth whitening on a patient while inviting others to join on the other two chairs she had available. As a curious consumer, I asked how much the teeth whitening procedure costs. She said $99 and it's guaranteed for 4 shades lighter. If you think these procedures are being done by dentists, think again.
Teeth Whitening at mall kiosks are growing in popularity due to consumer convenience and naivety, and the ability for kiosk operators to quickly find willing customers. These kiosks are generally franchise owned, so they are not administered by dental professionals. They are not dentists, RDHs or RDAs, rather workers “dressed up” in medical garments to give people a false sense they are being treated by a dental professional. Besides the fact that one would look ridiculous doing this procedure in the middle of a busy mall, it is also dangerous. The catch that makes the process legal is that operators do not place the product in the “patient’s” mouth. Instead, the “patient” inserts the bleaching product themselves.
Undergoing professional teeth whitening at a kiosk can cause irreversible damages to your teeth. The bleach generally used at these kiosks consists of high concentration
hydrogen carbamide peroxide, usually 35%. This is what dental offices use. The chemicals at this high of a concentration are extremely acidic, and if not properly administered, can ruin tooth enamel.
Professional teeth whitening should always be done under the supervision of a DDS: A Dentist assesses patients, and decides on the advisability of bleaching, and prediction of outcome for each patient. Furthermore, the dentist will have knowledge of the oral anatomy, principles of patient care, and the possible dangers involved: i.e (if gums are not adequately protected or if there is gum disease).
Update 3/6/2008
A
Mall Teeth-Whitening Business has been Shut Down in South Carolina
“A teeth-whitening business at Haywood Mall in Greenville has been ordered to shut down by state regulators who say that the operators are practicing dentistry without a license.
In issuing the order, the state regulators said that the light the business uses for teeth whitening is is so strong it is only allowed to be used by a licensed dentist.
A state dentistry official told WYFF News 4 that similar businesses are being shut down all across the country. ”
Update 3/22/2008
ABC News released a video piece on this titled
Teeth Whitening Kiosks at the Mall. It looks like these kiosk operators did not know what they were doing.
Update 8/11/2008
All Glamour White locations have been shut down in Oklahoma.
iSmile, located at Tulsa's Promenade Mall is still open, but have limited their staff to one employee and no longer wear white lab coats to give the appearance that they are following the law.
Read more about it here.
Known Teeth Whitening Kiosk Businesses:
BleachBright
LightSpa
Da Vinci Whitening System
iSmile
Laser Bright
iBriteExpress
WhiteSmileUSA
WOW Smile Xpress
ShineWhite




- TeethWhiteningReviews.com
You get none of that at the mall.
The most unsafe method of teeth whitening is the procedure performed at the dentist where 35% Hydrogen peroxide and higher is used. I've seen people who went to the dentist to get their teeth whitened and ended up with a hole burned in their lip and severe teeth sensitivity. Many dentists I've talked with don't even like doing these procedures because "it hurts their patients."
You take your chances with the dentist John, and I will stick with the lower H202 level products available with White Strips and in the Mall.
Any time you get info about mall kiosks from a dentist, ask yourself, What's in it for him? When money is involved, you are sure to get a answer that will bring HIM more business.
First let me note the inaccuracies so the readers of this information have more accurate information.
1. There are no guarantees of color or shade improvement made. Customers are told that they may realize anywhere from one to six shades of improvement by utilizing the bleaching treatment.
2. The business is not normally a franchise. The business in the picture at the beginning of the story was company owned at the time the photograph was taken. It was then sold to a local resident.
3. The bleaching treatment provided does not require a dentist, RDH or RDA. Nor does the self administering of an over the counter or dental provided home bleaching kit.
4. The peronnel working the kiosk never claim to be dentist or licensed, or certified in any way. If asked, they would be happy to explain that they not dental professionals at all.
5. The process is no more dangerous than using any over the counter whitening or bleaching system.
6. The participants receiving teeth bleaching are not patients but customers. They are no more a patient than someone purhasing Crest White Strips.
7. The percentage of hydrogen peroxide is not 35%. It is well below 22% which is the maximum percentage that can be sold or administered by non dental personnel.
Now that some of the false information has been clarified I would ask about the responsibility of the person that would print such inaccurate information.
The CA Dental Board anonymously participated in a whitening session provided by one of the above named companies. After the session was completed the owner was advised by the member of the Board that they had done a great job and violated none of the criteria of the Dental Board regarding providing a dental procedure.
In fact in most states the procedure is not considered a dental procedure as the customer is never touched by the operator, the percentage of hydrogen or carbomide peroxide is under the percentage which must be administered in a dentist supervised office and the light used by the company in the first photo is LED and emits no distinguishable heat like the UV lights used by many dentist.
There is plenty of accurate information available via many credible resources. After digesting the information in this posting I would have to question the credibility and judgement of the writer and the site.
Steve Fuller
We understand the need to justify the existence of your business. Here are my replies to your points:
"There are no guarantees of color or shade improvement made. Customers are told that they may realize anywhere from one to six shades of improvement by utilizing the bleaching treatment."
Then the kiosk operator should not have said that the results were guaranteed.
"The business is not normally a franchise. The business in the picture at the beginning of the story was company owned at the time the photograph was taken. It was then sold to a local resident."
The article states that teeth whitening kiosks are “generally franchise owned.” Lightspa is a franchise operation. Your very own business, iSmile, is listed in the franchise section on entrepreneur.com: http://www.entrepreneur.com/franchises/rankings/franchise500-115608/2008,.html
"The bleaching treatment provided does not require a dentist, RDH or RDA. Nor does the self administering of an over the counter or dental provided home bleaching kit."
You are right, it does not require a dentist. This is why the article was written. Kiosk teeth whitening is unsafe. Any one-time teeth whitening treatment that takes only 15 minutes must have a high concentration of hydrogen peroxide. It generally takes over a week to see results with typical over-the-counter whitening products, such as Crest White Strips (10% carbamide peroxide).
"The personnel working the kiosk never claim to be dentist or licensed, or certified in any way. If asked, they would be happy to explain that they not dental professionals at all."
The laymen consumer will not know the right questions to ask. To avoid confusion, all signage should state that the personnel working are "not dentists or licensed, or certified in any way."
"The process is no more dangerous than using any over the counter whitening or bleaching system."
What scientific evidence do you have to back this up?
"The percentage of hydrogen peroxide is not 35%. It is well below 22% which is the maximum percentage that can be sold or administered by non dental personnel."
For clarification, what hydrogen peroxide percentage does iSmile use? Stating that it is below 22% is not specific enough.
"the light used by the company in the first photo is LED and emits no distinguishable heat like the UV lights used by many dentist."
Then what is the purpose of the light if not to dehydrate the teeth? http://www.teethwhiteningreviews.com/artman/publish/teeth-dehydration-effects-during-bleaching.php
In addition to the medical garments the personnel wear, is the company further misleading the consumer with a light that does not do anything?
"The CA Dental Board anonymously participated in a whitening session provided by one of the above named companies. After the session was completed the owner was advised by the member of the Board that they had done a great job and violated none of the criteria of the Dental Board regarding providing a dental procedure."
This is extremely vague and without reference
"There is plenty of accurate information available via many credible resources."
Where can we find this "accurate information"?
In response to your points:
"Then the kiosk operator should not have said that the results were guaranteed."
The reason why most of these kiosk operators say that results are guaranteed is because most of these kiosks operators offer a MONEY BACK GUARANTEE. That's something that your dentist will never offer!
"The article states that teeth whitening kiosks are “generally franchise owned.” Lightspa is a franchise operation."
So what if it's a franchise. There are many reputable franchise operations in our country.
"You are right, it does not require a dentist. This is why the article was written. Kiosk teeth whitening is unsafe. Any one-time teeth whitening treatment that takes only 15 minutes must have a high concentration of hydrogen peroxide. It generally takes over a week to see results with typical over-the-counter whitening products, such as Crest White Strips (10% hydrogen peroxide)."
You assume because its 15 minutes that they "must have a high concentration of H202"??? This is where your whole argument falls apart. Your assumption is incorrect and reflects clearly that you have not done your research. You claim that this type of service is unsafe based on your misguided assumptions. As a result, the whole point of your article, that this is unsafe, is bogus.
"The laymen consumer will not know the right questions to ask. To avoid confusion, all signage should state that the personnel working are "not dentists or licensed, or certified in any way."
Absurd! Should we also insist that the clerk at the local grocery store who sells Crest White Strips post signage everywhere stating that they are "not dentists or licensed, or certified in any way." ?
"The process is no more dangerous than using any over the counter whitening or bleaching system."
"What scientific evidence do you have to back this up? "
Common Sense! You are the one claiming in your article that it's unsafe...what scientific evidence do you have to back this up? So far, you've based everything on your incorrect assumption that they are using 35% hydrogen peroxide.
If you want to rail against usafe teeth whitening with 35% peroxide, you should refocus your attention on the dentists who are the only ones using this high percentage. You should also research the thousands of patient complaints against DENTAL teeth whitening due to this high percentage.
"Then what is the purpose of the light if not to dehydrate the teeth? In addition to the medical garments the personnel wear, is the company further misleading the consumer with a light that does not do anything?"
There is wide debate on the effectiveness of a light in the bleaching process. The lights used by the dentists give off much more heat and therefore result in more tooth dehydration. According to the information in the link you provided, the light in the kiosk that is not as strong as the dental light, would probably contribute to better whitening results because there is less heat and therefore less dehydration so the bleaching agent isn't fighting as many "teeth fluids" coming out of the teeth.
If you're going to argue that bleaching lights don't work, then it's only fair to bring all the dentists who use the lights into your focus as well and not just attack the lights being used in the mall.
Regarding the "medical garments"...there are many professions where people who are not dentists wear lab coats or scrubs. Would you feel more comfortable if the next time you get a manicure/pedicure, facial, massage, etc. that the technician helping you would wear a trash bag?
"There is plenty of accurate information available via many credible resources."
Where can we find this "accurate information"?"
GREAT QUESTION...I suggest you start researching before you write your next article
"You assume because its 15 minutes that they "must have a high concentration of H202"??? This is where your whole argument falls apart. Your assumption is incorrect and reflects clearly that you have not done your research. You claim that this type of service is unsafe based on your misguided assumptions. As a result, the whole point of your article, that this is unsafe, is bogus."
If the H202 concentrations are in fact at the same level of over-the-counter products, 15 minutes of H202 contact is not enough time for deep teeth infusion and certainly not enough time to bring about long term results. If you are comparing this procedure to regular over-the-counter products, $149 is a complete rip-off. Why not just get crest white strips and do it in the privacy of your own home for $35 bucks?
"If you're going to argue that bleaching lights don't work, then it's only fair to bring all the dentists who use the lights into your focus as well and not just attack the lights being used in the mall."
The site shows that laser/light whitening does not work in other articles:
http://www.teethwhiteningreviews.com/artman/publish/teeth-dehydration-effects-during-bleaching.php , and there is another one as well.
It looks like you need to do your research.
Who said these products were the same as other over the counter products? If you take the time to read above, I believe that it's clear that they are a bit higher and therefore more effective.
The point is that they are well under 35% which the author of the article claims to be unsafe. The only people using 35% H202 are some dentists.
And regarding the light...that link you posted was already posted above. It was very interesting. Can you now tell me why so many dentists are using high powered lights to whiten their patients teeth if the light doesn't work?
There's plenty of debate about the light...here's a link for you with a study that shows the light is indeed effective...
http://www.zoomnow.com/clinicals/Zoom2_eval_lamp_white_paper.pdf
http://www.zoomnow.com/clinicals/Zoom2_eval_lamp_white_paper.pdf"
A study sponsored by the makers of the Zoom2 Light, Discus Dental? Common now! Are we that naive?
Are you afraid to anwer the question...if the light doesn't work, then why are so many dentists using it?
I believe dentists who use lights for in-office treatments are scamming patients as well. This should be addressed... perhaps in another article? Nontheless, the majority of dentists out there will have the well-being of patients as their primary goal.
I woould choose a well qualified dentist over a kiosk for professional teeth whitening any day.
cheers.
You owe an apology to your small readership for your lack of integrity. "The bleach generally used at these kiosks consists of high concentration hydrogen peroxide, usually 35%".
35% Peroxide? Where did you get that information?
Seriously, give us a source. We are all waiting in eager anticipation. I'll bet everyone on this board a free whitening that you are a dentist or hygienist. Could you be a little biased?
You assume the worst scenario, yahoo renegade businesses out to screw people at the malls by tricking them into believing they are dentists then hurting them by placing unsafe chemicals in their mouths. Laughable.
Have you considered the possibility that companies such as WhiteSmileUSA have a proven track record with over 25,000 whitenings? Did you contact any of these companies? Can YOU name sources for your bogus facts?
Not even sure why I wasted time replying,
Jim Valentine
To maintain unbiased our site keeps all comments live - even criticisms of this site and article.
You do a hit piece on legitimate businesses by using a scare tactic then demand that the companies list their proprietary formulas? Not how it works. If you had called me to "interview" me I would have gladly told you our percentage, off the record. Our % is proprietary because we did months of research to find the right balance of results and low side effects (soft tissue irritation and sensitivity), and giving that out is not in my company's best interests on a chat site. When approached by any agency we are happy to produce MSDS sheets that show the make up of our product.
Again, you owe your readers an apology with your original piece. It was a great example of poor journalism, especially from a supposed "unbiased" site.
WhiteSmileUSA's system is the best system for consumers. We don't over promise results, we are upfront with our clients about potential side effects, and offer a system where they can maintain their white teeth without using a regimen-based system (which most consumers don't follow) or go into the dentist and get fried by power bleaching solutions.
Brings up an interesting point here, questioning the safety of mall kiosks is interesting when the evidence of serious side effects lies with DENTAL solutions. I know this from talking to tens of thousands of ACTUAL consumers and taking customer surveys (real market research, something I doubt you have done). I also know this from actual dentists who buy my system.
On the legality of our system, the Dental Boards are simply posturing. While they can bend interpretations of existing statutes, there are no laws prohibiting our product. We have been operating over a year and have never been "shut down". The SC case is an instance of a scare tactic. Where in ANY state statute, SC or other, is there any mention of a LED light being a medical device. Not there. SC Dental Board cannot regulate a cosmetic practice. Period. They can get a Cease and Desist order, which is meaningless. The real case is the injunction hearing or actual court case. No State has won an injunction hearing because they can't. So, the MO here is is try unsuccessfully to shut down this segment, fail, then try to discredit it with hit pieces like yours.
The only people upset by this are dentists. Hurts when a billion dollar monopoly starts to erode.
I don't feel the procedure being done in the mall is unsafe, but there are some patients who are not good candidates for this type of procedure. Without examining someones mouth, it would be difficult to determine if you are one of them. But again even though it may cause more discomfort, it is not going to cause permanent harm.
I supose just like everything, there are some dentists who are ethical and conservative and there are some who are greedy and without morals. If all aspects are followed properly and things are clean, and realistic expectaions are informed, I don't have a problem with it.
The article was truly an hysterical event. Speaking as a teeth whitening manufacturer of 9 years bith over the counter and to dentist, there are too many false statements to even address. The truth is no lights work. Dentist have been using lights for curing of composites etc for 30 years. Then came Brite Smile, Zoom and others to market a teeth whitening light to dentist. ALL research not published by marketers of lights (mainly dental schools etc.) state no neglible difference with or without the light. Percentages stated here are wrong. 3 to 1 ratio between carbamide and hydroge peroxide. 16% HP=48% CP. The only difference between the high precntages in a dental office and the OTC products is how many treatments to get the same whiteness you want. 16% CP OTC product vs dental office treatment simply means you do 6 treatments at home to establish the same results.
The wonderful world of marketing opportunity. The whitening biz via selling lights to dentist is defintely the biggest AND MOST INGENIUS fisaco of marketing spending millions to sell lights to dentist for (when first started) $7,000+ each.
Wish we sold the lights then rather than manufacturing the gel............
It's obvious, by reading your postings above, that you are looking for any reason to discredit this new segment of the market that is not only effective, but more convenient than OTC products and safer and more affordable than traditional teeth whitening procedures done at the dentist.
Yes, the peroxide percentages are a bit higher than other OTC products. No where above is it specifically stated that they are a bit higher than Crest White Strips, which, according to another article on this website, contain a percentage of H202 that is less than 5%.
The main point of all of this is that the author of this article stated that "the bleach generally used at these kiosks consists of high concentration hydrogen peroxide, usually 35%." - This statement is completely FALSE.
Here is a fact for you... This new segment of Cosmetic Teeth Whitening offers the public a teeth whitening product that is Fast, Safe, Effective, and Affordable. The bleach used in the products of the legitimate companies in this segment consists of a concentration of peroxide that is high enough to produce good results, but low enough to cut the severe side effects that people experience at the dentist - it's a good balance.
Unfortunately there are some dentists and dental hygienists who are extremely possessive of their trade, have huge egos, and feel threatened by this new segment in the market. As a result these dentists and hygienists will continue to mislead the public and slander those in the cosmetic teeth whitening industry.
The truth is that the LightSpa treatment, because it is a 15 minute self-administered procedure is very safe. The vast majority of our customers experience no side effects at all. Unlike most dental patients.
The basis of most whitening products is hydrogen peroxide. It has been thoroughly researched over the last decade or so and has been overwhelmingly pronounced safe and effective.
But the dentists will make it seem like it's a procudure that needs to be closely monitored in order to aviod serious complications. You can't really blame them. Some people will always feel more comfotable having the whitening treatment done by a dental assistant and they'll pay for that level of assurance. Other people will feel comfortable with an over the counter treatment. And some will like the ease and low cost of the LightSpa product.
The fact remains that this business will be common in malls and salons within a year. It's moving in that direction at a rapid pace and there's no stopping it. As long as people are allowed to buy Crest Whitestrips in any grocery store, people will be allowed to self administer the LightSpa products in malls and salons. And they'll continue to do so because it's much quicker, and much more effective.
It is our job as a franchise to bring up the standard for professionalism within this new industry. We want to make sure that our customers are provided with a sanitary environment and receive the best experience possible.
Gary Bodley
LightSpa
What measures are taken to ensure that the "patient" at the mall doesn't have active decay? If there are no true dental personnel there examining the teeth, how irresponsible is it to subject someone to the horror of bleaching agents getting in decayed areas?
What about periodontal disease? Is someone monitoring for that too?
Let's face it, not everyone is a candidate for tooth whitening.
Seems to me that the kiosk operators are the irresponsible, greedy parties here, not professional dentists who are trained in the anatomy and inner workings of teeth.
According to Flosser's logic and yours for that matter, all Crest WhiteStrips, Aquafresh whitening trays, and other over the counter bleaching products should be pulled from the shelves.
What measures are taken to examine the oral health of customers that buy these over the counter bleaching products before they put them in their shopping carts?
The reason this is possible is because these products are for the most part safe they are no where near as dangerous as you and your minority of egotistical dental associates would like to scare the public into believing.
Of course it's a good idea for anyone considering teeth whitening to discuss the options with their dentist. However it's time for you guys stop making biased, hypocritical, and unrealistic aruments against this segment of cosmetic teeth whitening that provides the public with a safer, more convenient, and more affordable solution to traditional dental or other over the counter procedures.
If your going to stand by your position in your last point, I suggest you lobby to make the public sale of Crest White Strips illegal without a dental consultation. Good Luck!
If that's your position, then that's fine--case closed. But if your position is that kiosk whitening is better (i.e., more powerful and effective) than White Strips, then you can't feign surprise when dental professionals ask that it be held to a higher standard.
Are you feeling okay? I'll tell you what's happening here. Your bias has blinded you from the fundamental fallacy of your argument. You're so upset that other people have come up with a way to whiten teeth that is superior in all aspects to yours, that you are unable to rationally process a thought. You are like a poker player on tilt.
You are the only one who has ever argued or said that kiosk whitening is no different from WhiteStrips. Newsflash John. It's not the same, it's better. Not only is it better than WhiteStrips, but it's safer than the 35% peroxide that those in your dental community use.
Your hypocrisy has no bounds. How can you sit there and preach about safety when the most severe side affects associated with teeth whitening occur from the procedures given by you and your dental professionals?
This is simple...try to put your bias aside and follow this point:
Here are your words - "There are people out there who have dental conditions that make bleaching particularly unsafe for them. Are you aware of those conditions? Are the people who run the kiosks?"
Kiosk teeth whitening is self administered and is an over the counter product. Please answer this question John...who is aware of those conditions you speak of when a person buys any over the counter bleaching product?
What measures are taken to examine the oral health of customers that buy bleaching products before they put them in their shopping carts?
Once you answer these questions, then I will be happy to address your next attempt to discredit this industry which I know you are already contemplating.
To the dentist:
A needed and respected Doctor who after years of study deserves our respect for their expertise! Kudos!
But why the fight over a cosmetic over the counter treatment??
Does a dermatoligist have a complaint about tanning beds? Does a tanning bed technician monitor how long your entire body should be under UV and the frequency of your visits!!Are they trained in sanitizing a tanning bed where bodily fluids are left in a location where they can transfer from one person to another???
To the teeth whitening companies:
Congrats on your innovation in finding a solution to achieve results with your process and take care in choosing your people. (as in any consumer service industry).
I would have more concerns going to a nail or tanning salon. How do they sterilize a pedicure bath. Also if a employee in a industry does error is that entire industry not safe?
Speaking out about a particular incident does not damn and industry.
I guess the question is who has the higher net gross profit per whitening, that seems to be the argument here. The article has lost all it's might due to the fact it has erroneous facts.
Thanks for the brain tease but thats all it was. Not that hard to see the truth playing out here.
I bring all this up because articles like yours condone a negative attitude toward a legitimate industry full of people just trying to sell a safe, convenient product at a great price. Save the righteous, (misplaced) indignation for a worthy cause.
Also, dentists should actually not feel all that threatened seeing how the in office treatments still seem to give the whitest results. While some customers or patients if you will, prefer to bypass the highly concentrated bleach used in dental offices for a much less expensive and more comfortable procedure, there are still going to be plenty of people that will only trust their dentist, and think the higher prices mean better results. Heck, actually if you want to know the truth, dentists should buy a light for their offices, charge $150.00 to $300.00 for the treatment, and be making way more money than they are with their current treatments because more people can afford it, and it dosen't take up nearly as much chair time.
As you know, I haven't claimed that the use of a product like White Strips needs to be overseen by a dentist. Why? Because of the relative weakness of it. That's not to say it's ineffective--only that it's not as effective as what dentists offer. It can't be; by law, being an OTC product, it has to be kept weak. Now, I imagine that Crest made them as strong as they felt like they safely could since they want people to have the best results possible for an OTC product.
What you're saying is that your product is better than White Strips. Tell me... What makes it better? Is it more powerful? And if it is more powerful, then why shouldn't it be held to higher standards standards (i.e., professional oversite) as White Strips?
Kelly - There's no excuse for dental professionals being rude to you at the mall. I can't justify that. I think they just get very concerned because they see two possibilities with the kiosks: Either the service provided by them is no different than White Strips (meaning customers are being mislead and overcharged), or the services provided by them are more powerful than White Strips (meaning there ought to be some training and oversite of the kiosk operators).
James - If you think greed is the motivating factor behind the majority of people who oppose kiosks, you fail to understand your opponents. Certainly, greed will be a factor for some of them. But most of them are just genuinely concerned about patients' oral health. These people have years of professional training and experience. Instead of just dismissing their arguments as being founded in greed, you ought to instead engage them and try to at least understand their position. It's possible you know something they don't know, but it's also possible--with all of that training and experience--that it's the other way around.
You're right...we're not speaking the same language. The reason for this, in my opinion, is because you are dead set on condemning an industry in which you know little about. Why are you determined to undermine this industry?...I think it's because you are possessive of your trade. In other words, you don't like seeing other people involved in something that your profession has owned for years...your instinctive reflex is to immediately reject what you've seen in the mall without knowing the facts, just as the author of this article has done.
All this started because the author of this article passed judgment on something without having the facts. The author stated that kiosk teeth whitening booths generally use 35% H202 and is therefore unsafe. This John...is false. Once again, the only people using these "unsafe" levels are some dentists. Tell me...Am I wrong? I don't think so.
Now...to answer you other questions:
Yes it's better than White Strips...but that's not all John. It's also better than the whitening procedures performed by many dentists.
Why is it better than White Strips? First, it is more powerful. Why shouldn't it be held to higher standards (i.e., professional oversight) as White Strips? Because it is not at the dangerous levels that are used by some dentists (35%H202). In addition John, there are other factors at play that make this method the newest and best way to whiten teeth. There are other proprietary elements in these cosmetic solutions that maximize results and minimize side effects. There are other proprietary steps involved in the self application of these products that contribute to the overall goal that we consistently achieve - a happy customer.
I've seen the customers that come out of dental whitening procedures, and you and I both know John that a large portion of them are not happy either because they don't feel they got there $500 worth or because they have severe tooth sensitivity or a hole in their lip.
We're not dentists John, and we don't pretend to be. We always recommend that our customers talk their dentists first if they have any questions about teeth whitening.
In the end John, many things in this world change and improve. Technology and business have developed a new whitening product that is superior to traditional methods. The fact is John that these products work and are safer and more affordable than some traditional procedures available at the dentist. You should look at the bright side…now you can spend more time doing what you should be doing – fixing teeth rather than whitening them.
I am in Oregon and am about to open three malls here. I am personally pleased with my own results and the people I have serviced have ALL been exceptionally pleased as well.
I feel confident in this product and in our company and look forward to offering this to the people in my area.
As to rude and greedy people you can find them anywhere in any industry. I choose to not waste any time with them.
Also everyone here is blathering on about the concentration of the product used yet that grossly uninformed, unprofessional and completely idiotic article about the site in SC being closed tried to put the issue on the strength of the LED UV light we use.
???????
Let me clarify we use a Light Emitting Diode UltraViolet Light which is NOT a medical device. If you go to the parent company's site or others like mine you will see where we even list the FDA regulatory information. Hello!!!!
Our products and process have been researched and approved safe (FDA), our equipment has been researched and approved safe by the insurance underwrites industry and we all carry insurance just like any other 'professional' (when study massage I even had to have insurance). As to training well feel free to pick on me. I am in addition to being a proud part of BleachBright I am also an NHA CPT and while I am not taking blood from anyone as part of teeth whitening I have been THOROUGHLY trained in all safety procedures and regulations and know what we are doing is safe and legal. I also wouldn't work with a company that was 'shady' or not forthright. I have quit several good jobs in the past due to lack of company integrity and I have to say BleachBright is there in all ways and doesn't try to hide, embellish or mislead anyone. As a legally ordained ministed (2 and half years of seminary) I won't work with anyone who isn't coming from a place of honesty and integrity.
And on a final note chech THIS out!!! It recants some of the statements negligently made in earlier articles concerning SC and even specifically names BLEACHBRIGHT as being O.K.
Here is the article copied in - oddly enough the detrimental story is easy to access - this one is impossible and I was only able to access it as a google cache page - hmmm wonder why - but here it is for your reading pleasure. I love the way they try to justify there inappropriate and unprofessional accusations!
Posted on Tue, Mar. 18, 2008
VICKI LEE PARKER
(Raleigh) News & Observer
Smile. You can still get your teeth hitened on the cheap. The state board of dental examiners spent two days discussing whether employees at teeth-whitening kiosks in malls were practicing dentistry without a license.
Their conclusion: not always.
"Basically, we can't make a blanket policy about all of these things," said Bobby White, chief operations officer of the state board. "The way they set up their practices may vary. Some may be within the standard. We will continue to follow up on a case-by-case basis."
White said the board received a number of complaints after several such kiosks began opening at shopping centers across the state. The kiosks sell teeth-whitening products and offer customers the chance to use them on site. They have proved popular because of their convenience and price: $100 compared with the $500 to $600 that dentists charge.
Dentists have complained that the kiosks are not licensed to do such work and that customers could be hurting their teeth.
White said that the state law defines the removal of stains from human teeth as a practice of dentistry. But added that there are a number of gray areas.
"You can go to the drugstore and buy whitening stuff," he said. "If that what's going on here, there are no problems. But if someone else helps you do that or makes claims that a dentist would make, that's where we will be concerned."
He said the board has sent 10 cease-and-desist letters to whitening practices across the state that it considers in violation of the licensing law, which is a misdemeanor. Two of those cases have been referred to the courts for an injunction, White said.
The two businesses operating in Triangle malls, iBrite Express and BleachBright, were not sent letters and continue to operate. Employees at those kiosks ask customers to place the whitening products or trays in their own mouths to ensure that employees are not seen as doing dental work.
White said the board will continue to investigate complaints to see whether whitening businesses are complying with the law. Violators will receive warning letters asking them to stop any questionable practices. If they don't, the board could refer the case to the courts or a district attorney's office, he said.
M. Alec Parker, executive director of the N.C. Dental Society, said the board acted properly.
"In my view," Parker said, the board "is not being too aggressive by going in and making accusations that may not be true."
Parker said the society is concerned that people are putting strong chemicals into their mouth without being warned about possible unwanted consequences. He said some people have had allergic reactions or extreme sensitivity to whitening chemicals. In addition, Parker said that not all teeth can be whitened.
"We are concerned whether there is someone on site assessing if they are a good candidate for whitening before they spend their money," he said. "This is something we want to keep an eye on."
Again, if I want a haircut I see a barber/stylist. If I want a lobotomy I see a brain surgeon. Its basically the same comparison. Or you could liken tanning salons to dermatologists.
VICKI LEE PARKER
(Raleigh) News & Observer
Smile. You can still get your teeth whitened on the cheap. The state board of dental examiners spent two days discussing whether employees at teeth-whitening kiosks in malls were practicing dentistry without a license.
Their conclusion: not always.
"Basically, we can't make a blanket policy about all of these things," said Bobby White, chief operations officer of the state board. "The way they set up their practices may vary. Some may be within the standard. We will continue to follow up on a case-by-case basis."
White said the board received a number of complaints after several such kiosks began opening at shopping centers across the state. The kiosks sell teeth-whitening products and offer customers the chance to use them on site. They have proved popular because of their convenience and price: $100 compared with the $500 to $600 that dentists charge.
Dentists have complained that the kiosks are not licensed to do such work and that customers could be hurting their teeth.
White said that the state law defines the removal of stains from human teeth as a practice of dentistry. But added that there are a number of gray areas.
"You can go to the drugstore and buy whitening stuff," he said. "If that what's going on here, there are no problems. But if someone else helps you do that or makes claims that a dentist would make, that's where we will be concerned."
He said the board has sent 10 cease-and-desist letters to whitening practices across the state that it considers in violation of the licensing law, which is a misdemeanor. Two of those cases have been referred to the courts for an injunction, White said.
The two businesses operating in Triangle malls, iBrite Express and BleachBright, were not sent letters and continue to operate. Employees at those kiosks ask customers to place the whitening products or trays in their own mouths to ensure that employees are not seen as doing dental work.
White said the board will continue to investigate complaints to see whether whitening businesses are complying with the law. Violators will receive warning letters asking them to stop any questionable practices. If they don't, the board could refer the case to the courts or a district attorney's office, he said.
M. Alec Parker, executive director of the N.C. Dental Society, said the board acted properly.
"In my view," Parker said, the board "is not being too aggressive by going in and making accusations that may not be true."
Parker said the society is concerned that people are putting strong chemicals into their mouth without being warned about possible unwanted consequences. He said some people have had allergic reactions or extreme sensitivity to whitening chemicals. In addition, Parker said that not all teeth can be whitened.
"We are concerned whether there is someone on site assessing if they are a good candidate for whitening before they spend their money," he said. "This is something we want to keep an eye on."
Also, the dental establishment has stated that anyone touching another persons mouth is performing dentistry. And anyone guilty of touching anothers mouth can and will be issued a misdemeanor. I know nurses assistants that brush their patients teeth daily. Patients that cannot brush their own teeth. These nurse assistants are not dental professionals. By the dental board's logic, they should all be fined and probably arrested. Dentists, look in the mirror. This is absolutely ridiculous!!!
I personally work for Ismile in Northern California. I absolutely love all of the comments and feed back people have been giving over the month.
All you have to do to find out what process we use is ask us.
We take a silicone based mouthpiece, imprint the teeth top and bottom, fill with a 16% hydrogen peroxide gel developed by a dental chemist, spray with an organic proprietary blend accelarant and put a customer under the LED light for 15 minutes a session. A single session is anywhere between $99 and $149 depending upon the location and a double treatment which is done back to back from $149 to $199.
Every location eventually gets secret shopped by the Dental Board. Personally, I have given out my dental boards correspondences phone number numerous times so people can call to confirm we are safe and legal.
I am approached by dentists and RDA's on a consistent daily basis but the plain fact is that everything we use is FDA approved. We never pretent to be dentist and we never guarantee whitening.
All customers sign a waiver before the treatment stating that we cannot guarantee results, not to do it if: you have received dental surgery in the last 28 days, if you experience bleeding or soreness of the gums, if you are pregnant or breast feeding. It clearly states we want to only do the whitening on healthy teeth and gums. Plain and simple its buyer beware.
I love my job and I eventhough I wrote this I still know all of you will still be just as skeptical and pissed off but if you werent we wouldnt live in the land of the free speech!!!!! Have a great night :-)
I am a former dental assistant of 33 years and I opened my professional independant teeth whitening business about 5 years ago. I offer impressions for custom fitted trays(which I personally make) which is the identical procedure used by 90% of all dentists. I also retail all the same professional gels
I now travel the country doing about 16 cosmetic shows per year and have about 75 salons trained to offer this identical COSMETIC self applied procedure. Teeth whitening outside a dental office is here to stay! I have been challenged by many dental boards (BLAH BLAH BLAH) they all say the same thing! And yes the client does the impressions right inside my 10 x 10 booth. I work side by side by many of these light companies and I know they know exactly what they can and can't do. I personally do not use a lights as the clinical research department of the ADA has stated they have no effect on whitening. I have spent the last 5 years researching teeth whitening/laws etc. and have a bible of information. Teeth whitening outside a dental office is here to stay...I will make sure of that! I am very proud of what I offer to clients which is a safe, non-evasive, cosmetic procedure done BY THE CLIENT. Teeth Whitening is not brain surgery and I too know it's all about $$$. Well I could go on and on about my business. As you can see I have a passion for what I doing. Dentists need to get over this and go back to practicing dentistry!
bleachbright, and white science uses 9%. All my research shows nothing more. The term most often used is CARBAMIDE peroxide at 35%, which equates to a 9% hydrogen peroxide. Sadly, this writer didn't bother to explain this, and was more than likely fed this misinformation by those who most benefit from it... dentists.
The result were immediate and very noticeable.
I have a relative that is a dental hygenist and I am good friends with our personal dentist. They both agree that this method is safe in 99% of cases. They also agree the biggest complaints come from groups who represent the business interests of dentists. It cuts into their profits and they don't like it.
My dentist knew we were getting it done because I refused to pay his $500 price and I did not want to wear a mouth piece to sleep in for a week.
He cleaned our teeth first and then saw us the day after. He agreed we were whiter and everything looked fine.
He actually was thrilled because now I have to pay him to replace a crown that no longer matches my teeth!
I love it, my wife loved it, but just realize going in that YMMV.
I myself am considering to starting a teeth whitening business that will primarily conduct business in a mall setting or local salons/spas. I have red the many "back and forth" arguement listed above, I guess I feel it boils down to this:
If you can purchase this teeth whitening gel over the counter and put it in at home, what is so wrong with doing it with the added use of a high power led light which allows the chemical to have its reaction faster? You are just speeding up the process with the light, nothing more. The LED light I will be purchasing will cost $3500, most people cannot afford that just to speed up the proccess for something they are going to do maybe 2x a year.
I understand some peoples initial concern, but if these people are so concerned, why are'nt they arguing about pulling the product off the shelf entirely, not just harrasing kiosk owners?
When I first seen it done I had the same thought "Teeth whitening in the mall, that's kind of weird" after a little research my thought is now this "Wow, I can help people have whiter teeth, save them money and time, and make make money at the same time" So what is wrong with that??
Bill H.
Is teeth whitening without the supervision of a dentist LEGAL? Be it because of the percentage of the gel or because of the light source.
It is known and i think anyone can agree that, the higher the concentration of the peroxide level, the more sensitivity you are likely to feel! Now, remember, when you read the percentage of peroxide, take notice at what type of peroxide is being used: carbomide or hydrogen? And know that a higher carbomide peroxide level equals a lower percentage of hydrogen peroxide. Ultimately the difference would be that carbomide is an over the counter product that can be sold at your neighborhood pharmacy, and hydrogen peroxide is 9/10 something that only a dentist can administer or prescribe.
Also, as a person exposed to this industry, I just wanted to inform ALL CONSUMERS, that ANY teeth whitening method you CHOOSE, will give you a result. IF you go for over the counter products, I want you to know that in order to achieve the results you are lookin for, you need to be consistent with the product, and if you use whitening trays provided by your dentist, they WILL work as well, but again by being consistent with the method. The problem with these techniques are that they require time, patience, and consistency, which the majority of users give up on because of the sensitivity produced on their teeth and gums by the gel due to daily exposure, whichever one it may be (carbomide or hydrogen)!
When you choose a light activated system such as: BleachBright, LightSpa, Da Vinci Whitening System,iSmile,Laser Bright, iBriteExpress, ZOOM and BriteSmile - prices varying from $99 to $600... YOU ARE PAYING for the same TECHNIQUE and their MARKETING and their ADVERTISING. The technique is ofcourse a peroxide gel and a light. The differences are the concentration of that gel and the intensity of that light!
PLEASE KNOW that between these choices, the last two... ZOOM and BRITESMILE are in- office treatments that require a dentist because of their light source and percentage of peroxide. The need of a dentist would be legally required because improper application can cause irritation or slight burning of gums or skin.
CONSUMERS, be wise when choosing your product. Kiosks and unsupervised whitenings have their pros and cons just like everything else. The ISSUE is NOT about dentists, it is about YOU! IF at these kiosks at the mall you are paying 99 or 150 dollars for 15 minutes of YOUR own time, to whiten your own teeth, worth it to you, by all means go ahead. But COMMON sense tells you, that if its about saving some money, you can spend 40 dollars at Duane Reade for a light activated teeth whitening Crest product, to perform on yourself as well, with the benefit of being in the comfort of your own home achieving the same result is better for your pocket. DO NOT TELL ME that you are willing to pay a higher amount of money, for a system where you are performing the whitening yourself!!! If you pay for a service, than let that service be rendered to you whatever cost you are paying ($99 or $299) at these locations, if you end up doing it yourself while paying rip off prices, even 99 dollars, pretend your not satisfied and ask for a refund!!!
By the way, if you are the type to do some actuall research about terms and legalities about teeth whitening, IT IS illegal to perform whitening without the supervision of a dentist if you are using more than a certain percentage of peroxide, (go find out), but i will tell you this, if you plan on doing a whitening without their supervision, at least ask your own dentist at your routine dental visits about the following:
1) Are you a candidate for teeth whitening... (example, if you have recently placed crowns or veneers, if you are pregnant or nursing, if you have tetracycling stainings, if you take photosensitive medications, if your teeth are already light to begin with) so that you can be provided with a realistic expectation for your result or simply if you dont qualify because of any of the above mentioned reasons. I can guarantee you that even a trained technician cant answer or review your medical or dental conditions, and my dears, that is a very, very important part of your service, because it has to do with your well being.
2)What guarantees are given ( for example, they cant mention satisfaction guaranteed because that means they lose their money when most cases, you are not satisfied. They can only provide a whitening guarantee service because as long as you achieve even ONE shade lighter, that whitening was still achieved... Was it worth your money??? but ofcourse, the untrained can not answer how many shades lighter you can possibly get.
3)MOST IMPORTANTLY you MUST KNOW, that because this procedure is not supervised by a DENTIST, YOU CAN SUE the COMPANY, Franchise, whatever they are, simply because they KNOW it is illegal yet they choose to profit from you and your unawareness to teeth whitening details. Remember that the way marketing and adverising works, is partially if not entirely a gimmick to get your hard earned money!!!
Last but not least, if they are using a safe percentage like for example a 22% carbamide peroxide or 6% hydrogen peroxide as stated by the A.D.A that its a safe percentage, and a low intensity light to activate the gel, then you can use the same at home for a whole lot less. And if you go to per say BriteSmile and pay 299 as they advertise now, make sure its money worth spent, for a higher price usually means better results attached to good service and yes location. Remember the saying: NOT EVERYTHING THAT SHINES IS GOLD
The very first e-mailed I read on here was incorrect, the percentage of hydrogen peroxide is under 16%, this is higher than Crest Whitening Strips which is 4-8% depending on which package you purchase. I have done the Zoom2 and found that was 35-50%. Still Whitesmileusa is FDA approved- over the counter bleaching, anyone can buy.
All of this is also considered cosmetic so in fact they are not doing anything illegal, if anything they had found a better way to beat the system and guide users on the correct way to use the product. I've been to the kiosk myself and anyone who assist you is knowledgable and seems very helpful. When I asked several
q-s, the associate seemed honest and knew what they were talking about. In any situation they never say they were dentist or give any doubt that they are really more than what they are. They simply help guide me with my administer using a mouth piece.
They never once touched my mouth, they were very clean and I watched for cross contamination. I was please with my results, im not saying this method is for everyone but the cost was right and the 30 min process was way better than the Zoom.
They did go over a consent form which was good, I learned about diff things that I could be at risk for during and after the process.
not associated with ismile. I'm just an ordinary person who thinks whitening your teeth in the mall or Sam's Club, etc, is an EXCELLENT idea. Let me tell you about my own experience. Five years ago I had my teeth whitened with Bright Smiles (ever hear of the company)? It cost me 500 dollars. That's right, 500 dollars. It was done in a dentist office. But, the catch, the person who did my teeth whitening wasn't from that office. I think this is how it works. Bright smiles worked out a deal with the dentist, lets say, each customer that Bright Smiles does the work for, they give the dentist office a certain percentage. And in the meantime, the customer thinks they had their teeth whitened in the dentist office. Well, does that make sense to you people that object to whitening your teeth at mall locations? Listen, whitening your teeth is a cosmetic procedure, it does not need a dentist to do it. My own dentist even told me so. My son had his teeth whitened about six months ago with a so called dentist. It cost him 500 dollars. He said it was a total rip off. He didn't like the resulted and he can't get his money back. Why pay 500 dollars when you can do
it for 99.00 at the mall?
I am a single woman, and when I go out on my dates, the first thing I look at is a man's teeth. When I see yellow teeth, yuck! It is a total turn off for me. So, my suggestion to all you single guys (and girls for that matter) run to the mall that has one of the teeth whitening kiosks and get your teeth whitened. So good luck to all you single people out there. And good luck to those entrepreueurs who owns the ismiles franchise. Good job and hope you make lots of money. You are well deserved. And last but not least, to whom ever started this ismiles teeth whitening franchies, I salute you. A genius idea. I wish I had thought of it myself. I hope you sell a lot of franchises. Good luck and best wishes.